- Category:
- People & portrait
- Date taken:
- Location:
- Groningen
- Exif:
- 1/200s f/11 ISO 200 50mm
-
louiseashley
What do you like?
The detail and editing of the eyes in this looks fantastic, i love the close up shot and close cropping, love the low hue to! looks wicked, feels very close. brilliant
13 June 2012What would you improve?
Nothing, maybe do some the same with different people or same person but different expressions or hats? would be a brilliant collection! :)
-
KarolusLinus
What do you like?
Great crop and those eyes, so intriguing. You just keep looking at this portrait!
28 April 2012What would you improve?
Nothing, it's already special enough.
-
wbadecs
What do you like?
Amazing picture...and while every detail is picked out it is still flattering.
16 April 2012What would you improve?
I would not change anything at all.
-
amobley118
What do you like?
Flawless image! Love the eyes in this shot. The detail is amazing. Well done.
13 April 2012What would you improve?
I would not change anything.
-
GreyRoom
What do you like?
This is a perfectly amazing picture the eyes get to you a lot.
13 April 2012What would you improve?
Maybe you could blured him a little so the eyes would pop out a little more.
-
-
artchic4
this is such an intresting pic.I love how everything is so sharp and his eyes are of course the main focuss there beautifull:)
12 April 2012 -
maspick
What do you like?
The eyes really draw you in.
8 April 2012What would you improve?
Almost want it softened just a bit, but really it stands without need of change.
-
vintagephotograph
What do you like?
I like this! Its very original. I love how you can feel the pain in the eyes. Great expression. Good compisition, exposure, lighting focus. Very striking. Very sharp. Great shot!!!
6 April 2012What would you improve?
Nothing at all. Stunning photo.
Ernstjanvandam@GreyRoom Thanks for the feedback but blurring manually really is a no go. If you want that effect then you should open the aperture to 1.4 and focus on the eyes. In this picture I choose not to;)
13 April 2012